摘要We investigate the nucleus 10Be using the deformed relativistic mean field (RMF) model and BCS theory. The calculated density distribution suggests two α clusters in the nucleus 10Be. According to BCS theory, the two valence neutrons transit to the first excited state 02+ in a pair and form a 2-n cluster. By comparing the two neutron separation energy (S2n) with the single neutron separation energy (Sn), and analyzing the difference between the neutron and proton rms radii (Rn-Rp) calculated by the deformed RMF, we suggest that 10Be is the best candidate for a two-neutron skin. The two-neutron skin clings to the 2α clusters closely and makes the two α clusters have cross and chain distribution.
Abstract：We investigate the nucleus 10Be using the deformed relativistic mean field (RMF) model and BCS theory. The calculated density distribution suggests two α clusters in the nucleus 10Be. According to BCS theory, the two valence neutrons transit to the first excited state 02+ in a pair and form a 2-n cluster. By comparing the two neutron separation energy (S2n) with the single neutron separation energy (Sn), and analyzing the difference between the neutron and proton rms radii (Rn-Rp) calculated by the deformed RMF, we suggest that 10Be is the best candidate for a two-neutron skin. The two-neutron skin clings to the 2α clusters closely and makes the two α clusters have cross and chain distribution.
[1] Greiner W Z 1994 J. Phys. A 349 315 [2]Rose H J and Jones G A 1984 Nature 307 245 [3]Takemoto H, Horiuchi H and Ono A 2001 Phys. Rev. C 63 0346159 [4]Itagaki N and Okabe S 2000 Phys. Rev. C 61 044306 [5]Duarte S B et al 2002 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 80 235 [6]Feldmeier H and Schnack J 2000 Rev. Mod. Phys. 72 655 [7]Xu C and Ren Z Z 2003 Phys. Rev. C 68 034319 [8]Xu C and Ren Z Z 2003 Phys. Rev. C 69 024614 [9]Ren Z Z, Xu C, Wang Y Q et al 2004 Nucl. Phys. A 738 318 [10]Xu C and Ren Z Z 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 753 174 [11]Xu C and Ren Z Z 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 760 303 [12]Ren Z Z, Xu C and Wang Z J 2004 Phys. Rev. C 70 034304 [13]Arumugam P, Sharma B K and Patra S K 2005 Phys. Rev. C 71 064308 [14]Wang S H and Guo J Y 2006 High Energy Phys. Nucl. Phys. 30 87 (in Chinese) [15]Ou Li, Li Z X et al 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 112102 [16]Serot B D and Walecka J D 1986 Adv. Nucl. Phys. 16 1 [17]Reinhard P G 1989 Rep. Prog. Phys. 52 439 [18]Walecka J D 1974 Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 83 491 [19]Horowitz C J and Serot B D 1981 Nucl. Phys. A 368 503 [20]Reinhard P G, Rufa M, Maruhn J A, Greiner W and Friedrich J 1986 Z. Phys. 323 13 [21]Rufa M, Reinhard P G, Maruhn J A, Greiner W and Strayer M R 1988 Phys. Rev. C 38 390 [22]Ring P 1996 Prog. Part. Phys. 37 193 [23]Latha S, Warrier and Gambhir Y K 1994 Phys. Rev. C 49 871 [24]Hirata D, Toki H, Tanihata I and Ring P 1993 Phys. Lett. B 314 168 [25]Sugahara A and Toki H 1994 Nucl. Phys. A 579 557 [26]Sharma M M et al 1993 Phys. Lett. B 312 377 [27]Chen J G, Cai X Z et al 2004 Chin. Phys. Lett. 21 2140 [28]Meng J and Ring P 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3963 [29]Meng J et al 2002 Phys. Rev. C 65 041302
2010, Vol. 27 
