Intermediate Energy Coulomb Excitation of Neutron-Rich Nuclei
Rajiv Kumar1, Rajesh Kharab2, H. C. Sharma1
1Department of Applied Sciences, Haryana College of Technology and Management, Kaithal-136027, India 2Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra-136119, India
Intermediate Energy Coulomb Excitation of Neutron-Rich Nuclei
Rajiv Kumar1, Rajesh Kharab2, H. C. Sharma1
1Department of Applied Sciences, Haryana College of Technology and Management, Kaithal-136027, India 2Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra-136119, India
摘要We reinvestigate the collective effects of the retardation as well as the bending on the Coulomb excitation cross sections and also on the B(E2) strengths of some neutron-rich isotopes using the intermediate energy Coulomb excitation theory. It is found that the B(E2) strengths extracted from the experimental Coulomb excitation cross section data get suppressed approximately by 6%. Furthermore, the obtained B(E2) strengths in the energy range 30-100 MeV/A are found to be in better agreement with the corresponding values known from other sources, than those obtained by using the recoil-corrected relativistic Coulomb excitation theory.
Abstract：We reinvestigate the collective effects of the retardation as well as the bending on the Coulomb excitation cross sections and also on the B(E2) strengths of some neutron-rich isotopes using the intermediate energy Coulomb excitation theory. It is found that the B(E2) strengths extracted from the experimental Coulomb excitation cross section data get suppressed approximately by 6%. Furthermore, the obtained B(E2) strengths in the energy range 30-100 MeV/A are found to be in better agreement with the corresponding values known from other sources, than those obtained by using the recoil-corrected relativistic Coulomb excitation theory.
[1] Glasmacher T 2001 Nucl. Phys. A 693 90 [2] Alder K and Winther A 1975 Electromagnetic Excitation (Amsterdam: North-Holland) [3] Winther A and Alder K 1979 Nucl. Phys. A 319 518 [4] Scheit H et al 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3967 [5] Gade A et al 2003 Phys. Rev. C 68 014302 [6] Pritychenko B V et al 1999 Phys. Lett. B 461 322 [7] Ibboston R W et al 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 2081 [8] Dinca D C et al 2005 Phys. Rev. C 71 041302(R) [9] Cottle P D et al 2001 Phys. Rev. C 64 057304 [10] Cottle P D et al 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 172502 [11] Church J A et al 2005 Phys. Rev. C 72 054320 [12] Alexio A N F and Bertulani C A 1989 Nucl. Phys. A 505 448 [13] Bertulani C A et al 2003 Phys. Rev. C 68 044609 [14] Esbensen H 2008 Phys. Rev. C 78 024608 [15] Bertulani C A et al 2007 Phys. Lett. B 650 233 [16] Scheit H et al 2008 Phys. Lett. B 659 515 [17] Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data Files (ENSDF), National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, http//:www.nndc.bnl.gov/ [18] Niedermaier O et al 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 172501 [19] Caurier E, Nowaski F and Poves A 2001 Nucl. Phys. A 693 374 [20] Raman S et al 2001 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78 1
2010, Vol. 27 
