摘要Molecular dynamics simulations are performed with the recently developed empirical interaction potential by Morelon et al. Thermodynamics properties of solid UO2 that have been assessed include melt point, density, enthalpy, heat capacity, lattice parameter variation with temperature, mean-square-displacement and diffusion coefficients of oxygen ion. The results are compared with the data in literature and it is suggested that the rigid ionic potential provides perfect results below the superionic range. The data showing thermodynamics properties will become unacceptable when the temperature is higher than 2500 K. Compared with the previous empirical potentials, the empirical potential developed by Morelon et al. improves the agreement of these data with the recommend ones.
Abstract：Molecular dynamics simulations are performed with the recently developed empirical interaction potential by Morelon et al. Thermodynamics properties of solid UO2 that have been assessed include melt point, density, enthalpy, heat capacity, lattice parameter variation with temperature, mean-square-displacement and diffusion coefficients of oxygen ion. The results are compared with the data in literature and it is suggested that the rigid ionic potential provides perfect results below the superionic range. The data showing thermodynamics properties will become unacceptable when the temperature is higher than 2500 K. Compared with the previous empirical potentials, the empirical potential developed by Morelon et al. improves the agreement of these data with the recommend ones.
[1] Sindzingre P and Gillan M J 1988 J. Phys. C 21 4017 [2] Morelon N D, Ghaleb D, Delaye J M and Brutzel L V 2003 Philos. Mag. 83 1533 [3] Arima T, Idemistu K, Inagaki Y, Tsujita Y, Kinoshita M and Yakub E 2009 J. Nucl. Mater. 389 149 [4] Sun T Y, Long X G, Wang J and Hou Q 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 1784 [5] Cygan R T, Liang J J and Kalinichev A G 2004 J. Phys. Chem. B 108 1255 [6] Zou Y, Huai X L and Liang S Q 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett 26 013101 [7] Govers K, Lemehov S, Hou M and Verwerft M 2007 J. Nucl. Mater. 366 161 [8] Karakaidis T and Lindan P J D 1994 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6 2965 [9] Jackson R A, Murray A D, Harding J H and Catlow C R 1986 Philos. Mag. A 53 27 [10] Ewald P P 1921 Ann. Phys. 64 253 [11] Schwen D, Huang M, Bellon P and Averback R S 2009 J. Nucl. Mater. 392 35 [12] Plimpton S J 1995 J. Comput. Phys. 117 1 [13] Hoover W G 1985 Phys. Rev. A 311695 [14] Hoover W G 1986 Phys. Rev. A 34 2499 [15] Melchionna, Ciccotti and Holian 1993 Mol. Phys. 78 533 [16] International Nuclear Safety Centre (INSC), Material Properties Database, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, USA, http://www.insc.anl.gov/matprop/. [17] Drotning W D 1981 Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Thermophysical Properties, National Bureau of Standard (Gaithersburg, Maryland 15--18 June 1981) [18] Christensen J A 1963 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 46 607 [19] Harding J H, Martin D G and Potter P E 1989 Commission of European Communities Report EUR 12402 [20] Fink J K 2000 J. Nucl. Mater. 279 1 [21] Karakasidis T and Lindan P J 1994 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 6 2965 [22] Sindzinger P and Gillan M 1988 J. Phys. C 21 4017 [23] Ralph J and Hyland G J 1985 J. Nucl. Mater. 132 76 [24] Ronchi C and Hyland G J 1994 J. Alloys Compd. 213/214 159 [25] Clausen K, Hayes W, Macdonald J E and Osborn R 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 1238 [26] Hutchings M T 1987 J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I$\!$I 83 1083 [27] Marin J E and Contamin P 1969 J. Nucl. Mater. 30 16 [28] Lindan P J and Gillan M 1994 Philos. Mag. B 69 535
2010, Vol. 27 
