Strangeness Production Process pp→nK+ Σ^ within Resonance Model
CAO Xu1,3, LEE Xi-Guo1,2, WANG Qing-Wu 1,3
1Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 31, Lanzhou 7300002Center of Theoretical Nuclear Physics, National Laboratory of Heavy Ion Collisions, Lanzhou 7300003Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
Strangeness Production Process pp→nK+ Σ^ within Resonance Model
CAO Xu1,3;LEE Xi-Guo1,2;WANG Qing-Wu 1,3
1Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 31, Lanzhou 7300002Center of Theoretical Nuclear Physics, National Laboratory of Heavy Ion Collisions, Lanzhou 7300003Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
We explore production mechanism and final state interaction in the pp→nK^+Σ+ channel based on the inconsistent experimental data published respectively by COSY-11 and COSY-ANKE. The scattering parameter a>0 for nΣ+ interaction is favoured by large near-threshold cross section within a nonrelativistic parametrization investigation, and a strong n∑+ interaction comparable to pp interaction is also indicated. Based on this analysis we calculate the contribution from resonance ∆* (1920) through π+ exchange within resonance model, and the numerical result suggests a rather small near-threshold total cross section, which is consistent with the COSY-ANKE data. With an additional sub-threshold resonance Δ*(1620), the model gives a much better description to the rather large near-threshold total cross section published by COSY-11.
We explore production mechanism and final state interaction in the pp→nK^+Σ+ channel based on the inconsistent experimental data published respectively by COSY-11 and COSY-ANKE. The scattering parameter a>0 for nΣ+ interaction is favoured by large near-threshold cross section within a nonrelativistic parametrization investigation, and a strong n∑+ interaction comparable to pp interaction is also indicated. Based on this analysis we calculate the contribution from resonance ∆* (1920) through π+ exchange within resonance model, and the numerical result suggests a rather small near-threshold total cross section, which is consistent with the COSY-ANKE data. With an additional sub-threshold resonance Δ*(1620), the model gives a much better description to the rather large near-threshold total cross section published by COSY-11.
CAO Xu;LEE Xi-Guo;WANG Qing-Wu;. Strangeness Production Process pp→nK+ Σ^ within Resonance Model[J]. 中国物理快报, 2008, 25(3): 888-891.
CAO Xu, LEE Xi-Guo, WANG Qing-Wu,. Strangeness Production Process pp→nK+ Σ^ within Resonance Model. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2008, 25(3): 888-891.
[1]Balewski J T et al 1996 Phys. Lett. B 388 859 Balewski J T et al 1998 Phys. Lett. B 420 211 [2]Brand H et al 1998 Phys. Lett. B 420 217 [3]Sewerin S et al 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 682 [4]Moskal P et al 2002 J. Phys. G 28 1777 [5]Wolke M et al 2003 Nucl. Phys. A 721 683 [6]Kowina P et al 2003 Eur. Phys. J. A 18 351 Kowina P et al 2004 Eur. Phys. J. A 22 293 [7]Rozek T et al 2005 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20 680 [8]Abd El-Samad S et al 2006 Phys. Lett. B 632 27 [9]Zou B S and Riska D O 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 072001 [10]Tsushima K, Sibirtsev A and Thomas A W 1999 Phys. Rev. C 59 369 [11]F\"aldt G and Wilkin C 1997 Z. Phys. A 357 241 [12]Shyam R Penner G and Mosel U 2001 Phys. Rev. C 63022202 Shyam R 1999 Phys. Rev. C 60 055213 [13]Gasparian A et al 2000 Phys. Lett. B 480 273 [14]Laget L -M 1991 Phys. Lett. B 259 24 2001 Nucl. Phys. A 691 11 [15]Sibirtsev A, Tsushima K, Cassing W and Thomas A W nucl-th/0004022 [16]Valdau Yu et al 2007 Phys. Lett. B 652 245 [17]Rozek T et al 2006 Phys. Lett. B 643 251 [18]Xie J J and Zou B S 2007 Phys. Lett. B 649 405 [19]Machleidt R, Holinde K and Elster Ch 1987 Phys. Rep. 149 1 [20]Liu B C and Zou B S 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 042002 Liu B C and Zou B S 2006 Commun. Theor. Phys. 46 501 [21] Xie J J, Zou B S and Chiang H C arXiv:0705.3950 [22] Watson K 1952 Phys.Rev. 88 1163 Migdal A B 1955 Sov. Phys. JETP 1 2 [23]Goldberger M and Watson K M 1964 Collision Theory NewYork: Wiley [24] Sibirtsev A et al 2006 Eur. Phys. J. A 29 263(2006) Sibirtsev A 2006 Eur. Phys. J. A 27 269 [25] Sibirtsev A et al 2007 Eur. Phys. J. A 32 229 [26]F\"aldt G and Wilkin C 1995 Phys. Lett. B 354 20 F\"aldt G and Wilkin C 1997 Physica. Scripta 56 566 [27] Baldini A, Flamino V, Moorhead W G and Morrison D R O1988 Landolt-Bornstein, Numerical Data and Functional Relationshipsin Science and Technology ed Schopper H (New York: Springer) vol 12 [28] Tsushima K, Huang S W and Faessler A 2005 Phys. Lett. B 337 245 Baldini A, Flamino V, Moorhead W G and Morrison D R O 1995 J. Phys. G 21 33 [29]Wilkin C private communication.
2008, Vol. 25 
