Franck--Condon factors and r-Centroids for the A 1∑+u-X1∑+g Band System of 107,109Ag2: Comparison of the Observed and Calculated Absorption Band Strengths
A. Antic-Jovanovic1, M. Kuzmanovic1, V. Bojovic1, Murtadha A. Khakoo2, Russ R. Laher3
1Faculty of Physical Chemistry, University of Belgrade, PO Box 137, 1001 Belgrade, Serbia2Department of Physics, California State University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA3 Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of Technology, M/S 314-6, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Franck--Condon factors and r-Centroids for the A 1∑+u-X1∑+g Band System of 107,109Ag2: Comparison of the Observed and Calculated Absorption Band Strengths
A. Antic-Jovanovic1;M. Kuzmanovic1;V. Bojovic1;Murtadha A. Khakoo2;Russ R. Laher3
1Faculty of Physical Chemistry, University of Belgrade, PO Box 137, 1001 Belgrade, Serbia2Department of Physics, California State University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA3 Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of Technology, M/S 314-6, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
摘要Franck--Condon factors and r-centroids for the A 1∑+u-X1∑+g band system of 107, 109Ag2 are computed using Morse and Rydberg--Klein--Rees potentials for both lower and upper electronic states. The differences between the two sets of results are typically in the third decimal place for transitions involving vibrational levels with v' and v'' up to about 15. Somewhat larger deviations appear for higher vibrational levels, but both sets of results follow the same pattern, which is to match well with the relative absorption band strength distribution in our experimental spectrum. The relative absorption band strengths are calculated by assuming that the electronic transition moment has only a weak dependence on the internuclear distance r. Good agreement between our measured and calculated absorption band strength ratios is found, which provides an excellent test of the calculated Franck-Condon factors and relative absorption band strengths. The r-centroid value for the (v'=0, v''=0) band is found to be approximately equal to the average value of re' and re'', indicating that the potentials of both states are not significantly anharmonic around their minimum regions.
Abstract：Franck--Condon factors and r-centroids for the A 1∑+u-X1∑+g band system of 107, 109Ag2 are computed using Morse and Rydberg--Klein--Rees potentials for both lower and upper electronic states. The differences between the two sets of results are typically in the third decimal place for transitions involving vibrational levels with v' and v'' up to about 15. Somewhat larger deviations appear for higher vibrational levels, but both sets of results follow the same pattern, which is to match well with the relative absorption band strength distribution in our experimental spectrum. The relative absorption band strengths are calculated by assuming that the electronic transition moment has only a weak dependence on the internuclear distance r. Good agreement between our measured and calculated absorption band strength ratios is found, which provides an excellent test of the calculated Franck-Condon factors and relative absorption band strengths. The r-centroid value for the (v'=0, v''=0) band is found to be approximately equal to the average value of re' and re'', indicating that the potentials of both states are not significantly anharmonic around their minimum regions.
A. Antic-Jovanovic;M. Kuzmanovic;V. Bojovic;Murtadha A. Khakoo;Russ R. Laher. Franck--Condon factors and r-Centroids for the A 1∑+u-X1∑+g Band System of 107,109Ag2: Comparison of the Observed and Calculated Absorption Band Strengths[J]. 中国物理快报, 2007, 24(9): 2566-2568.
A. Antic-Jovanovic, M. Kuzmanovic, V. Bojovic, Murtadha A. Khakoo, Russ R. Laher. Franck--Condon factors and r-Centroids for the A 1∑+u-X1∑+g Band System of 107,109Ag2: Comparison of the Observed and Calculated Absorption Band Strengths. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2007, 24(9): 2566-2568.
[1] Kleman B and Lindkvist S 1955 Arkiv Fysik 9 385 [2] Ruamps J 1959 Ann. Phys. Paris 4 1111 [3] Maheshwari R C 1963 Ind. J. Phys. 37 368 [4] Brown C M and Ginter M L 1978 J. Mol. Spectrosc. 69 25 [5] Simmard B et al 1991 Chem.Phys. Lett. 186 415 [6] Kramer H G et al 1992 Chem. Phys. Lett. 193 331 [7] Beutel V et al 1993 J. Chem Phys. 98 2699 [8] Freser P A 1954 Can. J. Phys. 32 515 [9] Nicholls R W and Jermain W R 1956 Proc. Phys. Soc. LXIX 3-A253 [10] Nicholls R W and Stewart A L 1962 Atomic andMolecular Processes ed Bates D R (New York: Academic) [11] Gilmore F R et al 1992 J. Phys. Chem. Data 21 1005 [12] Pekeris C L 1934 Phys. Rev. 34 98 [13] Felenbok P 1963 C. R. Acad. Sc. 256 2334 [14] Morse M D 1986 Chem. Rev. 86 1049
2007, Vol. 24 
