Surface Emitting THz Wave Parametrical Oscillator Using MgO:LiNbO
ZHANG Xian-Bin1, SHI Wei1, T. Ikari2, H. Ito2
1Department of Physics, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 7100482Photo Dynamics Research Center, RIKEN, 519-1399 Aramaki-Aoba, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
Surface Emitting THz Wave Parametrical Oscillator Using MgO:LiNbO
ZHANG Xian-Bin1;SHI Wei1;T. Ikari2;H. Ito2
1Department of Physics, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 7100482Photo Dynamics Research Center, RIKEN, 519-1399 Aramaki-Aoba, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
摘要Room-temperature operation terahertz (THz) wave source is demonstrated using three MgO:LiNbO3 crystals which have a noncollinear arrangement. The experimental results show that the THz wave can be tunable from 0.8THz to 3.0THz, and the peak energy output is 103pJ/pulse at 1.5THz. The noncollinear cavity configuration makes the THz beam have Gaussian-like spatial distribution, small divergence angle, perpendicularly eradiated from the crystal surface. The beam quality factor M2 is measured to be Mx2=1.15, Mz2=1.25 for characterizing the THz wave beam. Experiments also show that the THz beam can be focused by using a polyethylene lens, and the focal spot size is close to the diffraction limit.
Abstract:Room-temperature operation terahertz (THz) wave source is demonstrated using three MgO:LiNbO3 crystals which have a noncollinear arrangement. The experimental results show that the THz wave can be tunable from 0.8THz to 3.0THz, and the peak energy output is 103pJ/pulse at 1.5THz. The noncollinear cavity configuration makes the THz beam have Gaussian-like spatial distribution, small divergence angle, perpendicularly eradiated from the crystal surface. The beam quality factor M2 is measured to be Mx2=1.15, Mz2=1.25 for characterizing the THz wave beam. Experiments also show that the THz beam can be focused by using a polyethylene lens, and the focal spot size is close to the diffraction limit.
[1] Andrei G, Hebling J and Kuhl J 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 3000 [2] Zhang X C, Ma C F, Jin Y and Lu T M 1992 Appl. Phys.Lett. 61 3080 [3] Wu Q and Zhang X C 1997 Appl. Phys. Lett. 71 1285 [4] Kawase K, Manabu S and Ito H 1996 Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 2483 [5] Kawase K, Mizuno M, Sohma S and Ito H 1999 Opt. Lett. 24 1065 [6] Imai K, Kodo Kawase and Ito H 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 1026 [7] Imai K, Kawase K and Ito H 2001 Opt. Exp. 8 699 [8] Watanabe Y, Kawase K and Ikari T 2003 Appl. Phys.Lett. 83 800 [9] Watanabe Y, Kawase K, Ikari T, Ito H, Ishikawa Y andMinamide H 2003 Appl. Opt. 42 5744 [10] Kawase K, Yuichi O and Watanabe Y 2003 Opt. Exp. 11 2549 [11] Kawase K, Shikata J, Minamide H, Imai K and Ito H 2001 Appl.Opt. 40 1423 [12] Kawase K, Shikata J and Ito H 2002 J. Phys. D: Appl.Phys. 35 R1 [13] Stephen J B, Robert L B 1979 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 15 415 [14] Zhang X B and Shi W 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 5237(in Chinese) [15]Zhang X B, Ikari T, Chen Y L, Shi W and Ito H 2006 Acta Opt.Sin. 26 536 (in Chinese) [16] Johnston T F 1998 Appl. Opt. 37 4840