A Photon-Counting Full-Waveform Lidar
Bing-Cheng Du1 , Zhao-Hui Li1 , Guang-Yue Shen1 , Tian-Xiang Zheng1 , Hai-Yan Zhang1 , Lei Yang1 , Guang Wu1,2**
1 State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, East China Normal University, Shanghai 2000622 Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006
Abstract ：We present the results of using a photon-counting full-waveform lidar to obtain detailed target information with high accuracy. The parameters of the waveforms (i.e., vertical structure, peak position, peak amplitude, peak width and backscatter cross section) are derived with a high resolution limit of 31 mm to establish the vertical structure and scattering properties of targets, which contribute to the recognition and classification of various scatterers. The photon-counting full-waveform lidar has higher resolution than linear-mode full-waveform lidar, and it can obtain more specific target information compared to photon-counting discrete-point lidar, which can provide a potential alternative technique for tomographic surveying and mapping.
收稿日期: 2019-05-18
出版日期: 2019-08-23
:
42.68.Wt
(Remote sensing; LIDAR and adaptive systems)
42.79.Pw
(Imaging detectors and sensors)
85.60.Gz
(Photodetectors (including infrared and CCD detectors))
引用本文:
. [J]. 中国物理快报, 2019, 36(9): 94201-.
链接本文:
https://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/CN/10.1088/0256-307X/36/9/094201
或
https://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/CN/Y2019/V36/I9/94201
[1] Sun S and Salvaggio C 2013 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 6 1440 [2] Jakubiec A and Reinhart C F 2013 Sol. Energy 93 127 [3] Luo S, Wang C, Xi X et al 2014 Opt. Express 22 5106 [4] Schulien J A, Behrenfeld M J, Hair J W et al 2017 Opt. Express 25 13577 [5] Wei G, Shalei S, Bo Z et al 2012 ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 69 1 [6] Hakala T, Suomalainen J, Kaasalainen S et al 2012 Opt. Express 20 7119 [7] Li W, Niu Z, Sun G et al 2016 Opt. Express 24 4771 [8] Bruggisser M, Roncat A, Schaepman M E et al 2017 Remote Sens. Environ. 196 28 [9] Wallace A M, Ye J, Krichel N J et al 2010 EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2010 896708 [10] Wallace A M, McCarthy A, Nichol C J et al 2013 IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52 4942 [11] Degnan J 2016 Remote Sens. 8 958 [12] Mallet C and Bretar F 2009 ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 64 1 [13] Zwally H J, Schutz B, Abdalati W et al 2002 J. Geodynamics 34 405 [14] Li H, Chen S, You L et al 2016 Opt. Express 24 3535 [15] Bao Z, Liang Y, Wang Z et al 2014 Appl. Opt. 53 3908 [16] Antolovic I M, Bruschini C and Charbon E 2018 Opt. Express 26 22234 [17] Ren X, Connolly P W R, Halimi A et al 2018 Opt. Express 26 5541 [18] Kirmani A, Venkatraman D, Shin D et al 2014 Science 343 58 [19] O'Toole M, Lindell D B and Wetzstein G 2018 Nature 555 338 [20] Swatantran A, Tang H, Barrett T et al 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 28277 [21] Warburton R E, McCarthy A, Wallace A M et al 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 2266 [22] Maccarone A, McCarthy A, Ren X et al 2015 Opt. Express 23 33911 [23] McCarthy A, Ren X, Frera A D et al 2013 Opt. Express 21 22098 [24] Xia H, Shentu G, Shangguan M et al 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 1579 [25] Ren X, Altmann Y, Tobin R et al 2018 Opt. Express 26 30146 [26] Nie S, Wang C, Xi X et al 2018 Opt. Express 26 A520 [27] Buller G and Wallace A 2007 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 13 1006 [28] Ren M, Gu X, Liang Y et al 2011 Opt. Express 19 13497 [29] Liang Y, Huang J, Ren M et al 2014 Opt. Express 22 4662 [30] Li Z, Wu E, Pang C et al 2017 Opt. Express 25 10189 [31] McCarthy A, Krichel N J, Gemmell N R et al 2013 Opt. Express 21 8904 [32] Tobin R, Halimi A, McCarthy A et al 2017 Opt. Eng. 57 031303 [33] Steinvall O, Sjöqvist L and Henriksson M 2012 Proc. SPIE 8375 83750C [34] Henriksson M, Larsson H, Grönwall C et al 2016 Opt. Eng. 56 031204 [35] Harding D, Dabney P, Abshire J et al 2010 NASA Earth Sci. Techno. Forum 2010 22 [36] Markus T, Neumann T, Martino A et al 2017 Remote Sens. Environ. 190 260 [37] Hiskett P A, Parry C S, McCarthy A et al 2008 Opt. Express 16 13685 [38] Krichel N J, McCarthy A, Collins R J et al 2010 Proc. SPIE 7681 768108 [39] Du B, Pang C, Wu D et al 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 4198
[1]
.
[2]
.
[3]
.
[4]
TANG Lei**;WANG Cong-Rong;WU Hai-Bin;DONG Ji-Hui. Rayleigh Doppler Lidar for Higher Tropospheric and Stratospheric Wind Observation
[5]
REN Zhi-Jun;LIANG Xiao-Yan**;YU Liang-Hong;LU Xiao-Ming;LENG Yu-Xin;LI Ru-Xin**;XU Zhi-Zhan**
. Efficient Spherical Wavefront Correction near the Focus for the 0.89PW/29.0fs Ti:Sapphire Laser Beam
[6]
TANG Lei**;WANG Yong-Tao;SHU Zhi-Feng;DONG Ji-Hui;WANG Guo-Cheng;XU Wen-Jing;HU Dong-Dong;CHEN Ting-Di;DOU Xian-Kang;SUN Dong-Song;CHA Hyunki. Analysis of Detectors and Transmission Curve Correction of Mobile Rayleigh Doppler Wind Lidar
[7]
REN Zhi-Jun;LIANG Xiao-Yan;LIU Mei-Biao;XIA Chang-Quan;LU Xiao-Ming;LI Ru-Xin;XU Zhi-Zhan. Wavefront Correction of Pettawat Laser System by a Deformable Mirror with 50mm Active Aperture
[8]
SUN Bao;CHEN Fu-Shen. Experimental Investigation of Integrated Optical Intensive Impulse Electric Field Sensors
[9]
ZHANG Ling;ZHANG Chun-Yu;LI De-Hua;WEI Zhi-Yi;ZHANG Zhi-Guo;Hans J. Eichler;Stephan Strohmaier. Characteristics of Nd:YGG Laser Operating at 4 F 3/2 -4 I 9/2
[10]
CAO Zhao-Liang;MU Quan-Quan;HU Li-Fa;LIU Yong-Gang;PENG Zeng-Hui;XUAN Li. High Closed Loop Correction Accuracy with a Liquid Crystal Wavefront Corrector
[11]
YANG Yong-Jun;CHEN Fu-Shen;SUN Bao. An Isotropic Electric-Field Sensing System Using Optical Probe
2019, Vol. 36 
