| Original Articles |
|
|
|
|
A Strength Softening Phase Transition Observed in Shocked (Mg0.92,Fe0.08)SiO3 Perovskite at About 83GPa |
| HE Lin1,2;GONG Zi-Zheng1;JING Fu-Qian 1,3 |
| 1Institute of High Pressure Physics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 6100312College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 6100663Laboratory for Shock Wave and Detonation Physics Research, Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, PO Box 919-111, Mianyang 621900 |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
HE Lin, GONG Zi-Zheng, JING Fu-Qian 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 332-335 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract We report the experimental data of Hügoniot longitudinal sound velocity VL for natural (Mg0.92,Fe0.08)SiO3 enstatite sample at about 40--140GPa, consisting of three new data and five previously reported data but revised by our new Hügoniot equation of state parameters. Three segments, separated by two discontinuities, appear in the VL--pH (shock pressure) plot. Analyses show that the first discontinuity at about 64GPa, with a sharp increase of VL of about 21%, is judged to be a phase transition from enstatite to Pbnm perovskite (PV); while the second one at about 83GPa, with a dramatic decrease of VL of about 23%, is likely caused by a subtle structural change from Pbnm PV to tetragonal PV, accompanied by material strength softening due to melting of oxygen sublattices. This strength softening evidence is obtained first from shock wave experiments, and probably has profound implications for probing into the origin of low seismic velocity anomaly in the Earth's lower mantle and thus constraining the geophysical and geochemical models for the Earth's lower mantle.
|
| Keywords:
91.60.Ba
62.50.+p
91.35.Ed
|
|
|
Received: 16 September 2007
Published: 27 December 2007
|
|
| PACS: |
91.60.Ba
|
(Elasticity, fracture, and flow)
|
| |
62.50.+p
|
|
| |
91.35.Ed
|
(Structure of the Earth's interior below the upper mantle)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Murakami M et al 2004 Science 304 855
[2] van der Hilst R D and K\'arason H 1999 Science 283 1885
[3] Serghiou G Zerr A and Boehler R 1998 Science 280 2093
[4] Fiquet G et al 2000 Geophys. Res. Lett. 27 21
[5] Gong Z Z et al 2004 Geophys. Res. Lett. 31 L04614
[6] Gong Z Z et al 1999 Chin. Phys. Lett. 16 695
[7] Watt J P and Ahrens T J 1986 J. Geophys. Res. 917495
[8] McQueen R G Hopson J W and Fritz J N 1982 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 53 245
[9] Jing F Q 1999 Introduction to Experimental Equation of State2nd edn (Beijing: Science Press) (in Chinese)
[10] Duffy T S and Ahrens T J 1992 J. Geophys. Res. 97 4503
[11] Duffy T S and Vaughan M T 1988 J. Geophys. Res. 93 383
[12] Wentzcovitch R M et al 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 018501
[13] Dziewonski A M and Anderson D L 1981 Phys. Earth Planet.Inter. 25 297
[14] Li B S and Zhang J Z 2005 Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 151143
[15] Murakami M et al 2007 Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 256 47
[16] McQueen R G Marsh S P and Fritz J N 1967 J. Geophys. Res. 72 4999
[17] Shim S H Duffy T S and Shen G 2001 Science 293 2437
[18] Badro J et al 2004 Science 305 383
[19] Lin J F et al 2006 Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 122304
[20] Kapusta B and Guillop\'e M 1993 Phys. Earth Planet.Inter. 75 205 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
