| Original Articles |
|
|
|
|
Asymmetric Magnetization Reversal Probed by Recoil Loop Measurements inan Exchange Biased La0.67Sr0.33MnO3/La0.33Ca0.67MnO3 Bilayer Film |
| WANG Zhi-Hong1;H. -U. HABERMEIER2;G. CRISTIANI2;SUN Ji-Rong1;SHEN Bao-Gen1 |
| 1State Key Laboratory of Magnetism, Institute ofPhysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 603, Beijing 1000802Max-Planck-Institut fur Festko perforschung, Heisenbergstrasse 1, D-70569, Stuttgart, Germany |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
WANG Zhi-Hong, H. -U. HABERMEIER, G. CRISTIANI et al 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 278-281 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract We exploit the recoil loop measurements to study the asymmetric magnetization reversal in an exchange-biased La0.37Sr0.33MnO3/La0.33Ca0.67MnO3 bilayer film. It is found that the recoil curve encloses a marked area only in the second quadrant of the hysteresis loop, and the recoil susceptibility in the descending branch of the major loop is evidently higher than that in the ascending branch. The study indicates that the exchange anisotropy of a unidirectional nature and an orientation deviated from the easy axis of the ferromagnetic layer plays a crucial role in creating the reversal asymmetry.
|
| Keywords:
75.60.Ej
75.60.Jk
75.30.Gw
|
|
|
Received: 20 September 2007
Published: 27 December 2007
|
|
| PACS: |
75.60.Ej
|
(Magnetization curves, hysteresis, Barkhausen and related effects)
|
| |
75.60.Jk
|
(Magnetization reversal mechanisms)
|
| |
75.30.Gw
|
(Magnetic anisotropy)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Meiklejohn W H and Bean C P 1956 Phys. Rev. 102 1413
[2]Nogues J and Schuller Ivan K 1999 J. Magn. Magn.Mater. 192 203
[3] Berkowitz A E and Takano K 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200 552
[4] Nikitenko V I, Gornakov V S, Dedukh L M, Kabanov Yu P,Khapikov A F, Shapiro A J, Shull R D, Chaiken A and Michel R P 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 R8111
[5] Fitzsimmons M R, Yashar P, Leighton C, Schuller Ivan K,Nogues J, Majkrzak C F and Dura J A 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 3986
[6] Leighton C, Song M, Nogues J, Cyrille M C and SchullerIvan K 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 88 344
[7] Leighton C and Schuller Ivan K 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63174419
[8] Panagiotopoulos I, Moutis N and Christides C 2002 Phys.Rev. B 65 132407
[9]Gierlings M, Prandolini M J, Fritzsche H, Gruyters M andRiegel D 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 092407
[10]Krivorotov I N, Leighton C, Nogues J, Schuller Ivan K andDan Dahlberg E 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 100402(R)
[11] Spenato D, Pogossian S P and Le Gall H 2003 J. Magn. Magn.Mater. 262 294
[12] Beckmann B, Nowak U and Usade K D 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 187201
[13] Blomqvist P, Krishnan K M and Ohldag H 2005 Phys. Rev.Lett. 94 107203
[14] Ryu K S, Kim D H, Shin S C and Akinaga H 2005 Phys.Rev. B 71 155308
[15] Camarero J, Sort J, Hoffmann A, Garcia-Martin J M,Dieny B, Miranda R, and Nogues J 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 057204
[16] Paul A, Kentzinger E, R\"{ucker U and Br\"{uckel T 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 092410
[17] Tillmanns A, Oertker S, Beschoten B, G\"{untherodt G,Leighton C, Schuller Ivan K, and Nogues J 2006 Appl. Phys.Lett. 89 202512
[18] Ji X, Pakhomov A B and Krishnan K M 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 09E507
[19] Liedke M O, Liedke B, Keller A, Hillebrands B, M\"{ucklichA, Facsko S and Fassbender J 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75220407(R)
[20] Harland C, Lewis L H, Chen Z and Ma B M 2004 J. Magn.Magn. Mater. 271 53
[21] Feutrill E H, McCormick P G and Street R 1996 J. Phys. D 29 2320
[22] Goll D, Seeger M and Kronm\"{uller H 1998 J. Magn. Magn.Mater. 185 49
[23] Emura M, Cornejo D R and Missella F P 2000 J. Appl.Phys. 87 1387
[24] Al-Rsheed A and El-Hilo M 2000 J. Phys. D 33840
[25] Zhang S Y, Zhang H W, Shen B G, Zhao T, de Boer F R andBuschow K H J 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 87 1410
[26] Kang K, Lewis L H, Jiang J S and Bader S D 2005 J. Appl.Phys. 98 113906
[27] Wang Z H, Cristiani G, Habermeier H -U and Bland J A C 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 054407
[28] Wang Z H, Cristiani G and Habermeier H -U 2003 Appl.Phys. Lett. 82 3731
[29] Fernadez-Diaz M T, Martinez J L, Alonso J M andHerrero E 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1277 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
