Chin. Phys. Lett.  2011, Vol. 28 Issue (9): 092501    DOI: 10.1088/0256-307X/28/9/092501
NUCLEAR PHYSICS |
Fission of Weakly Prolate 119Sn and Weakly Oblate 209Bi Nuclei Induced by 500 and 672 MeV Negative Pions
Mukhtar Ahmed Rana*, Gul Sher, Shahid Manzoor, M. I. Shahzad
Physics Division, Pakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology (PINSTECH), P.O. Nilore, Islamabad, Pakistan
Cite this article:   
Mukhtar Ahmed Rana, Gul Sher, Shahid Manzoor et al  2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 092501
Download: PDF(608KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract Fission cross-sections of 119Sn and 209Bi induced by negative pions of two energies 500 and 672 MeV were measured using a CR−39 nuclear track detector. Target-detector stacks were exposed to pion beams at the Brookhaven National Laboratory (USA). Measurement results are compared with the corresponding calculations using the computer code CEM95. Agreement between measurements and calculations is fairly good for the 209Bi target nuclei whereas it is poor for 119Sn at both investigated energies of 500 and 672 MeV. Fission cross−section results of 119Sn and 209Bi are explained using the equilibrium properties of these nuclides including nuclear electric quadrupole moments which determine the shapes of nuclei. A logarithmic dependence of fission cross−section on Z2/A is observed for the above−mentioned reactions and a critical limit of Z2/A is identified with the value of 30 which divides the curve of σf versus Z2/A into two regimes, one with weak dependence and the other with strong dependence.
Keywords: 25.80. Hp      24.60.Dr     
Received: 10 January 2011      Published: 30 August 2011
PACS:  25.80. Hp  
  24.60.Dr (Statistical compound-nucleus reactions)  
TRENDMD:   
URL:  
https://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/10.1088/0256-307X/28/9/092501       OR      https://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/Y2011/V28/I9/092501
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Mukhtar Ahmed Rana
Gul Sher
Shahid Manzoor
M. I. Shahzad
[1] Bohr N 1936 Nature 137 344
[2] Bohr N and Wheeler J A 1939 Phys. Rev. 56 426
[3] von Egidy T 1987 Nature 328 773
[4] Peterson R J, deBarros S, deSouza I O, Gaspar M B, Khan H A and Manzoor S 1995 Z. Phys. A 352 181
[5] Feng Z Q and Jin G M 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 062501
[6] Bao J D, Lü K, Liu L and Jia Y 2005 Chin. Phys. Lett. 22 1880
[7] Mashnik S G 1995 The Computer Code CEM95, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency Data Bank (Paris, France) (http://www.nea.fr/abs/html/iaea1247.html)
[8] Gudima K K Mashnik S G and Toneev V D 1983 Nucl. Phys. A 401 329
[9] Prokofiev A V, Mashnik S G and Sierk A J 1999 Nucl. Science Engin. 131 78
[10] Iljinov A S, Mebel M X, Bianchi N et al 1992 Nucl. Phys. A 543 517
[11] Rana M A 2008 Radiat. Meas. 43 1546
[12] Rana M A 2008 Nucl. Instrum. Methods. A 592 354
[13] Nuclear Data Centre, Berkley National Laboratory, USA (http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/)
[14] Lippens, P E, Olivier-Fourcade J and Jumas J C 2000 Hyperfine Interact. A 126 137
[15] Bieroń J and Pyykkö P 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 133003
[16] Sierk A J 1986 Phys. Rev. C 33 2039
[17] Türcka D, Zigaa W and Clerc H G 1974 Phys. Lett. B 49 335
[18] Peterson R J 2010 J. Nucl. Radiochem. Sci. 11 R1
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] MA Yugang, SHEN Wenqing, FENG Jun. An Improved Microscopic Method for Calculating Initial Exciton Number[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 1993, 10(2): 092501
Viewed
Full text


Abstract